H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 4-1
Helena Sukova holds a 4–1 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1992 Sydney second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 7-5 6-1 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1991* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| May 17, 1991* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Ginger Helgeson | 6-4 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1991* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-4 6-7 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1991* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-1 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Helena Sukova | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |