H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 1-1
Helena Sukova and Kimberly Po Messerli are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1995 Oakland fourth round 5-7 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1995* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 5-7 7-6 6-2 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1993* | Philadelphia | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Kimberly Po Messerli | 7-6 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |