H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 11-2
Helena Sukova holds a 11–2 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 5–0 on carpet and 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1995 Brighton third round 6-3 6-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
11
–
2
13 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1995* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-3 6-7 7-6 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1995* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lori Mcneil | 7-5 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1993* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lori Mcneil | 6-4 6-7 6-2 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-3 6-2 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1987 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1987* | Princeton | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-0 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1987 | Washington | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-4 2-6 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 7-5 7-5 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1986* | Zurich | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-3 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Helena Sukova | 6-3 6-4 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| May 3, 1985* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-3 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |