H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 0-1
Mariaan De Swardt holds a 1–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics second round 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Mariaan De Swardt | 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,219 | 581 | 300 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,788 | 66 | 83 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,042 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,152 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,130 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #8 | 2,099 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,037 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #12 | 1,966 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,888 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #35 | 1,776 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |