H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-1

Helena Sukova holds a 3–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1992 Schenectady fourth round 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1992* Schenectady WTA 250 R16 Hard Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 7-5 7-6 Helena Sukova #13 Match data
Sep 29, 1990* Tokyo Dentsu WTA 250 R16 Carpet Helena Sukova #13 6-7 6-3 6-2 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Aug 18, 1988* Montreal WTA 1000 R32 Hard Helena Sukova #7 6-3 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data
Feb 11, 1986* Boca Raton WTA 250 R128 Hard Helena Sukova #10 6-1 7-5 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,849 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Helena Sukova Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,583 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,757 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,542 0 1
1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,588 0 1
1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,593 0 1
1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,746 0 1
1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,740 0 1
1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,772 0 1
1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,780 0 1
1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,663 0 1
1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,672 0 1
1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9 — — — — — — —
1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9 — — — — — — —
1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9 — — — — — — —