H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Helena Sukova holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1991 Manhattan Beach third round 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Helena Sukova #15 6-0 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #143 Match data
Oct 4, 1986* Hilversum WTA 250 QF Carpet Helena Sukova #6 6-7 6-4 7-6 Nathalie Herreman #56 Match data
May 29, 1983* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Helena Sukova 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,583 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,757 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9 — — — — — — —