H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 2-1
Helena Sukova holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1993 Essen third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1993* | Essen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicole Jagerman | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 7-5 6-3 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Helena Sukova | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |