H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Patty Fendick H2H: 5-0

Helena Sukova holds a 5–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1992 Eastbourne fourth round 6-4 6-0.

CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Helena Sukova #18 6-4 6-0 Patty Fendick #75 Match data
Jan 7, 1989* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Helena Sukova #6 6-2 6-4 Patty Fendick #21 Match data
Mar 5, 1988* San Antonio WTA 250 QF Hard Helena Sukova #7 6-4 7-6 Patty Fendick #23 Match data
Jan 9, 1988* Sydney WTA 500 SF Grass Helena Sukova #7 7-6 6-1 Patty Fendick #49 Match data
Feb 20, 1987* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Helena Sukova #6 3-6 6-0 7-5 Patty Fendick #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,217 580 297 66.1% 0 1 0 3 5 9
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% 1,583 0 0
17 1982 23–23 50.0% 1,757 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,499 0 0
18 1983 33–20 62.3% 1,907 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% 1,430 0 0
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #6 2,151 0 3 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1988 49–19 72.1% #8 2,120 0 5 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,043 0 6 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,025 0 6 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1992 38–15 71.7% #12 1,976 0 9 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,925 0 9 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,889 0 9 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
31 1996 17–15 53.1% #35 1,792 0 9
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,661 0 9
33 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,637 0 9