H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Tina Mochizuki H2H: 1-0
Helena Sukova holds a 1–0 lead over Tina Mochizuki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1988 San Antonio third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1988* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-3 | Tina Mochizuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Tina Mochizuki | — | — | — | 1,684 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Tina Mochizuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 5–17 | 22.7% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–25 | 24.2% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 1 |