H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Helga Masthoff vs Ana Maria Arias H2H: 4-0
Helga Masthoff holds a 4–0 lead over Ana Maria Arias in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Helga Masthoff leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Helga Masthoff won the 1972 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 1972* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-3 6-2 | Ana Maria Arias | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1971* | Bastad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-2 6-1 | Ana Maria Arias | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1970* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Helga Masthoff | 6-3 6-0 | Ana Maria Arias | Match data |
| Dec 2, 1969* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-0 6-3 | Ana Maria Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
| Ana Maria Arias | — | — | — | 1,528 | 39 | 81 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helga Masthoff | Ana Maria Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |