H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helga Masthoff vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 4-1
Helga Masthoff holds a 4–1 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Helga Masthoff leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ingrid Bentzer won the 1972 Monte Carlo final 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRG
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1972* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Ingrid Bentzer | 7-5 6-3 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1971* | Bastad | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1971* | Beaulieu | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-4 4-6 8-6 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1970* | Munich Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Helga Masthoff | 6-4 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1968* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Helga Masthoff | 6-3 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helga Masthoff | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |