H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Helga Masthoff vs Joyce Williams H2H: 3-2
Helga Masthoff holds a 3–2 lead over Joyce Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Joyce Williams leads 2–1 on carpet, while Helga Masthoff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helga Masthoff won the 1974 Wimbledon second round 9-8 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Helga Masthoff | 9-8 6-4 | Joyce Williams | Match data |
| May 13, 1972* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-8 7-5 6-1 | Joyce Williams | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1970* | Moscow Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Helga Masthoff | 7-5 6-3 | Joyce Williams | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1968* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Joyce Williams | 8-10 6-2 6-3 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1968* | Bremen | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Joyce Williams | 6-2 6-1 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
| Joyce Williams | — | — | — | 1,966 | 188 | 88 | 68.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helga Masthoff | Joyce Williams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–20 | 63.6% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 46–17 | 73.0% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 23–12 | 65.7% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 30–8 | 78.9% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 | 1973 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 | 1975 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,835 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 | 1979 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |