H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helga Masthoff vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-0
Helga Masthoff holds a 1–0 lead over Lea Antonoplis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helga Masthoff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helga Masthoff won the 1979 Monte Carlo fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRG
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1979* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helga Masthoff | 6-0 6-4 | Lea Antonoplis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
| Lea Antonoplis | #599 | #66 | 6 | 1,774 | 126 | 176 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helga Masthoff | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #66 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,413 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,455 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,432 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |