H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Henrieta Nagyova vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-0
Henrieta Nagyova holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henrieta Nagyova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henrieta Nagyova won the 2001 Amelia Island third round 3-6 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2001* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Henrieta Nagyova | 3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | Lilia Osterloh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Lilia Osterloh | #1,223 | #41 | 738 | 1,697 | 83 | 138 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henrieta Nagyova | Lilia Osterloh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #79 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #43 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #156 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #144 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #230 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #237 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |