H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Henrieta Nagyova vs Radka Bobkova H2H: 1-0
Henrieta Nagyova holds a 1–0 lead over Radka Bobkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henrieta Nagyova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henrieta Nagyova won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-2 6-4 | Radka Bobkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Radka Bobkova | #639 | #47 | 322 | 1,658 | 47 | 73 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henrieta Nagyova | Radka Bobkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #53 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #85 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #130 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,525 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #88 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |