H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Herfs vs M Bloem H2H: 1-0

Herfs holds a 1–0 lead over M Bloem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Herfs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Herfs won the 1972 Nice Intl round of 64 1-6 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Herfs 1-6 6-3 6-2 M Bloem Match data Mar 22, 1972* R64 Nice Intl WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Herfs 1,500 1 4 20.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
M Bloem 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Herfs M Bloem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1970 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0 1972 0–2 0.0% 1,480 0 0
1972 1–2 33.3% 1,480 0 0
1976 0–1 0.0% 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Herfs M Bloem
Yr Clay Yr Clay
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 2 2 0.0%
1972 1 2 3 33.3%
1976 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 1 4 5 20.0% Career 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Herfs M Bloem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1970 1484 98.4 33.3% -1.67 0–1 +0.14 1972 1481 96.4 20.0% -2.60 0–1 -0.16
1972 1480 98.1 +11 28.6% -2.00 1–0 +0.18
1976 1465 94.5 0.0% -4.50 +0.21
Career 1501 95.9 +11 25.0% -2.33 1–1 +10.60 Career 1500 98.0 20.0% -2.60 0–1 -8.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.