H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0

Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1990 Singapore Tennis Open round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hu Na
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hu Na 6-3 6-1 Emiko Okagawa Match data Apr 25, 1990* R64 Singapore Tennis Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na — — — 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Emiko Okagawa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1980 2–3 40.0% — 1,504 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,482 0 0 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0
22 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,537 0 0 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0
23 1986 11–16 40.7% — 1,575 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0
24 1987 17–18 48.6% — 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1988 8–18 30.8% — 1,584 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1989 8–13 38.1% — 1,577 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
27 1990 7–12 36.8% — 1,560 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Emiko Okagawa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Emiko Okagawa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
17 1980 1505 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.30 — 2–0 — -0.20 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03
18 1981 1497 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75
20 1983 1482 102.7 — — — — +55 — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.33 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89
22 1985 1537 120.9 — — — — +34 — +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14
23 1986 1575 112.6 — — — — +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03
24 1987 1654 129.6 — — — — -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1584 122.3 — — — — +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
26 1989 1578 119.6 — — — — -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22
27 1990 1561 108.7 — — — — -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
28 1991 1542 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1702 122.7 — — — — -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.