H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-0

Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Isabel Cueto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-1.

USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hu Na 6-3 6-1 Isabel Cueto #100 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,504 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,482 0 0 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1985 6–9 40.0% 1,537 0 0 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1986 11–16 40.7% 1,575 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5
24 1987 17–18 48.6% 1,654 0 0
25 1988 8–18 30.8% 1,584 0 0
26 1989 8–13 38.1% 1,577 0 0
27 1990 7–12 36.8% 1,560 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12
16 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1980 1505 99.5 40.0% -1.30 2–0 -0.20 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1981 1497 94.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.01 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1983 1482 102.7 +55 25.0% -1.13 +0.33 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1985 1537 120.9 +34 +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 +0.41 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1986 1575 112.6 +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24
24 1987 1654 129.6 -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05
25 1988 1584 122.3 +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71
26 1989 1578 119.6 -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32
27 1990 1561 108.7 -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79
28 1991 1542 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.17
Career 1702 122.7 -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.