H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hu Na vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 0-1
Jill Hetherington holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Hetherington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1988 US Open first round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jill Hetherington | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |