Hu Na
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Nov 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 12, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Hu Na vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 0-1
Jill Hetherington holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Hetherington leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1988 US Open round of 128 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Hetherington | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Hu Na | Match data | Aug 31, 1988* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,702 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 31 | 58 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #81 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,458 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Hu Na | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1988 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1989 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1988 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 29 | 46 | 75 | 38.7% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 16 | 22 | 38 | 42.1% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | — | 24 | 42 | 66 | 36.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Hu Na | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1505 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | — | 2–0 | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 1497 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 1983 | 1507 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.39 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1543 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.64 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1482 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.13 | — | — | — | +0.33 | 1985 | 1523 | 106.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.21 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1537 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.25 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.01 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1537 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +34 | 43.8% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | 1987 | 1534 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 33.3% | -0.17 | 2–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.14 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1575 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -17 | -5 | 42.2% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.9 | +2.38 | 1988 | 1573 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | -38 | 46.9% | -0.23 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.9 | +1.57 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1654 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -85 | -57 | 49.4% | +0.18 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.9 | +0.05 | 1989 | 1532 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | +52 | 36.8% | -0.89 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.3 | +0.78 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1584 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -52 | -39 | 36.7% | -0.90 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.3 | -0.71 | 1990 | 1482 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | -40 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.63 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.39 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1578 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -61 | +49 | 39.6% | -0.33 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | +0.32 | 1991 | 1476 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1561 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -60 | +88 | 41.9% | -0.47 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.79 | 1992 | 1459 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.64 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1542 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 | 1993 | 1438 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.25 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1702 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -57 | +13 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 17–27 (39%) | 16–19 (46%) | 96.9 | +2.29 | — | 1645 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +29 | -5 | 40.2% | -0.64 | 11–22 (33%) | 9–14 (39%) | 91.7 | +3.80 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jill Hetherington
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 26, 1991 | H2H |
| Kathy Jordan | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Nov 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Nana Smith | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 23, 1989 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |