H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 2-1

Hu Na holds a 2–1 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hu Na leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1989 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 7-6.

USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #31 6-2 7-6 Hu Na Match data Apr 12, 1989* R64 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Hu Na 7-6 7-6 Leila Meskhi #36 Match data Oct 27, 1988* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard
Hu Na 6-4 2-6 6-4 Leila Meskhi #47 Match data Feb 18, 1988* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,504 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
19 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,482 0 0 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1985 6–9 40.0% 1,537 0 0 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1986 11–16 40.7% 1,575 0 0 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4
24 1987 17–18 48.6% 1,654 0 0 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1988 8–18 30.8% 1,584 0 0 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1989 8–13 38.1% 1,577 0 0 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 1990 7–12 36.8% 1,560 0 0 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 0 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Leila Meskhi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Leila Meskhi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1505 99.5 40.0% -1.30 2–0 -0.20
18 1981 1497 94.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.01
19 1987 1656 134.5 +27 -63 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.80
20 1983 1482 102.7 +55 25.0% -1.13 +0.33 1988 1696 129.7 +32 -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65
21 1989 1795 139.4 +11 -135 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90
22 1985 1537 120.9 +34 +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 +0.41 1990 1928 151.0 +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1986 1575 112.6 +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38 1991 1937 151.3 -20 +20 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1987 1654 129.6 -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05 1992 1928 157.9 -26 +60 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 1988 1584 122.3 +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71 1993 1872 148.4 -2 +90 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 1989 1578 119.6 -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32 1994 1843 148.6 -3 +108 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 1990 1561 108.7 -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79 1995 1833 120.0 0 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 1991 1542 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.17 1996 1747 89.2 0.0% -4.63 -0.21
Career 1702 122.7 -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 1987 152.8 +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.