H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hu Na vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 2-1
Hu Na holds a 2–1 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hu Na leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1989 Amelia Island second round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1989* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 7-6 | Hu Na | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1988* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Hu Na | 7-6 7-6 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1988* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Hu Na | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |