H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hu Na vs Maria Lindstrom H2H: 1-1
Hu Na and Maria Lindstrom are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hu Na leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Lindstrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Lindstrom won the 1988 Phoenix third round 6-4 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Lindstrom | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | Hu Na | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1987* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Hu Na | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | Maria Lindstrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Lindstrom | — | — | — | 1,616 | 38 | 66 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Maria Lindstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 1 |