Hu Na
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Nov 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 12, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC
Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1989 Wichita round of 32 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | 6-1 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Feb 23, 1989* | R32 | Wichita | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,702 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hu Na | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Hu Na | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1983 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1986 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1988 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1988 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 29 | 46 | 75 | 38.7% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 16 | 22 | 38 | 42.1% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | Career | 125 | 129 | 254 | 49.2% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 33 | 33 | 66 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Hu Na | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1505 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | — | 2–0 | — | -0.20 | 1983 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1981 | 1497 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 1984 | 1478 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 1983 | 1482 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.13 | — | — | — | +0.33 | 1985 | 1542 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.89 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 1985 | 1537 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +34 | 43.8% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | 1986 | 1683 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +1.30 |
| 1986 | 1575 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -17 | -5 | 42.2% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.9 | +2.38 | 1987 | 1659 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | -85 | 41.9% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.83 |
| 1987 | 1654 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -85 | -57 | 49.4% | +0.18 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.9 | +0.05 | 1988 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | -37 | 37.3% | -1.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -1.05 |
| 1988 | 1584 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -52 | -39 | 36.7% | -0.90 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.3 | -0.71 | 1989 | 1592 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.25 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +2.41 |
| 1989 | 1578 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -61 | +49 | 39.6% | -0.33 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | +0.32 | 1990 | 1746 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -257 | — | 51.7% | +0.10 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.1 | -0.70 |
| 1990 | 1561 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -60 | +88 | 41.9% | -0.47 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.79 | 1991 | 1740 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -243 | -169 | 48.9% | -0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.3 | +0.98 |
| 1991 | 1542 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 | 1992 | 1697 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -146 | 48.5% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.1 | +0.32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1749 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -270 | -150 | 51.6% | +0.31 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.6 | -0.37 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1773 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -260 | -181 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1788 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -292 | — | 54.1% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +0.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1666 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -192 | — | 31.6% | -1.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1673 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| Career | 1702 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -57 | +13 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 17–27 (39%) | 16–19 (46%) | 96.9 | +2.29 | Career | 1850 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -251 | -124 | 47.3% | -0.20 | 63–57 (53%) | 39–25 (61%) | 108.6 | +0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Nov 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 12, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |