H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1986 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hu Na
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hu Na 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #54 Match data Aug 28, 1986* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na — — — 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1980 2–3 40.0% — 1,504 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,482 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,537 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1986 11–16 40.7% — 1,575 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1987 17–18 48.6% — 1,654 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1988 8–18 30.8% — 1,584 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1989 8–13 38.1% — 1,577 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1990 7–12 36.8% — 1,560 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,541 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1980 1505 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.30 — 2–0 — -0.20 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1981 1497 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1983 1482 102.7 — — — — +55 — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.33 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1985 1537 120.9 — — — — +34 — +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1986 1575 112.6 — — — — +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1987 1654 129.6 — — — — -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1988 1584 122.3 — — — — +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1989 1578 119.6 — — — — -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1990 1561 108.7 — — — — -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1991 1542 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.17 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1702 122.7 — — — — -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.