H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-1

Neige Dias holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1986 Wichita round of 32 7-5 6-3.

USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neige Dias 7-5 6-3 Hu Na Match data Jan 23, 1986* R32 Wichita WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neige Dias 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,493 0 0
15 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
17 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,504 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0 1985 6–12 33.3% 1,527 0 0
19 1986 19–19 50.0% 1,610 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,482 0 0 1987 12–15 44.4% 1,647 0 1
21 1988 25–13 65.8% 1,712 0 2
22 1985 6–9 40.0% 1,537 0 0 1989 9–10 47.4% 1,673 0 2
23 1986 11–16 40.7% 1,575 0 0
24 1987 17–18 48.6% 1,654 0 0
25 1988 8–18 30.8% 1,584 0 0
26 1989 8–13 38.1% 1,577 0 0
27 1990 7–12 36.8% 1,560 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0%
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 -0.12
15 1982 1497 97.5 +31 50.0% -0.63 +0.58
17 1980 1505 99.5 40.0% -1.30 2–0 -0.20 1984 1482 98.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.16
18 1981 1497 94.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.01 1985 1528 114.5 +21 +57 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1986 1611 116.1 +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1983 1482 102.7 +55 25.0% -1.13 +0.33 1987 1648 123.5 -61 +20 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1988 1712 129.5 -100 +84 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 1985 1537 120.9 +34 +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 +0.41 1989 1674 112.9 +55 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
23 1986 1575 112.6 +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38
24 1987 1654 129.6 -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05
25 1988 1584 122.3 +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71
26 1989 1578 119.6 -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32
27 1990 1561 108.7 -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79
28 1991 1542 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.17
Career 1702 122.7 -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 1749 122.0 -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.