H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Hu Na vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-1

Hu Na and Patty Fendick are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1990 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hu Na
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #48 7-5 7-5 Hu Na Match data Jun 27, 1990* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Hu Na 3-6 7-5 6-1 Patty Fendick #22 Match data Jul 20, 1989* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hu Na — — — 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hu Na Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 2–3 40.0% — 1,504 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,482 0 0 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,537 0 0 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1986 11–16 40.7% — 1,575 0 0 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1987 17–18 48.6% — 1,654 0 0 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1988 8–18 30.8% — 1,584 0 0 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3
26 1989 8–13 38.1% — 1,577 0 0 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1990 7–12 36.8% — 1,560 0 0 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,541 0 0 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hu Na Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1983 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1985 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hu Na Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1505 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.30 — 2–0 — -0.20 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1981 1497 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1983 1482 102.7 — — — — +55 — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.33 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1985 1537 120.9 — — — — +34 — +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 — +0.41 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36
23 1986 1575 112.6 — — — — +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37
24 1987 1654 129.6 — — — — -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33
25 1988 1584 122.3 — — — — +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 1989 1578 119.6 — — — — -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1990 1561 108.7 — — — — -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 1991 1542 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.17 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
Career — 1702 122.7 — — — — -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29 — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.