H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hu Na vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 0-1
Stephanie Rehe holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Rehe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Los Angeles fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1988* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-2 6-2 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |