Hu Na
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 3 | 5 | Nov 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 12, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Hu Na vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1
Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1990 Chicago round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Hu Na | Match data | Feb 15, 1990* | R32 | Chicago | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,702 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,777 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Hu Na | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 1985 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1986 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1993 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 25 | 1988 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1989 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 28 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 29 | 46 | 75 | 38.7% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 16 | 22 | 38 | 42.1% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | — | 63 | 73 | 136 | 46.3% | 24 | 35 | 59 | 40.7% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Hu Na | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1980 | 1505 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.30 | — | 2–0 | — | -0.20 | 1986 | 1494 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 18 | 1981 | 1497 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 1482 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.13 | — | — | — | +0.33 | 1989 | 1525 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.3 | +0.49 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1577 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | +71 | -98 | — | 43.9% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–6 (14%) | 96.8 | +0.78 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1537 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | +34 | 43.8% | -0.75 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | 1991 | 1682 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | -51 | -22 | -78 | 49.4% | -0.26 | 6–7 (46%) | 8–2 (80%) | 106.6 | -0.08 |
| 23 | 1986 | 1575 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -17 | -5 | 42.2% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 104.9 | +2.38 | 1992 | 1645 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -10 | — | 41.0% | -0.59 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.8 | -0.65 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1654 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -85 | -57 | 49.4% | +0.18 | 6–7 (46%) | 2–6 (25%) | 98.9 | +0.05 | 1993 | 1651 | 135.8 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -78 | -87 | 41.7% | -0.75 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.7 | -1.72 |
| 25 | 1988 | 1584 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -52 | -39 | 36.7% | -0.90 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 96.3 | -0.71 | 1994 | 1709 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.15 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.5 | -1.10 |
| 26 | 1989 | 1578 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -61 | +49 | 39.6% | -0.33 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | +0.32 | 1995 | 1701 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -37 | -134 | 53.8% | +0.30 | 6–11 (35%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.8 | -1.16 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1561 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -57 | -60 | +88 | 41.9% | -0.47 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.79 | 1996 | 1694 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -56 | — | 42.3% | -0.48 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.6 | -0.18 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1542 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 | 1997 | 1596 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | +84 | -20 | — | 25.8% | -1.55 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–3 (0%) | 93.1 | -0.98 |
| Career | — | 1702 | 122.7 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -57 | +13 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 17–27 (39%) | 16–19 (46%) | 96.9 | +2.29 | — | 1778 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -42 | -104 | 45.0% | -0.32 | 33–44 (43%) | 25–32 (44%) | 97.2 | -1.94 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tami Whitlinger Jones
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 29, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 21, 1996 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jan 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 25, 1997 | H2H |