H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hu Na vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 0-2
Wiltrud Probst holds a 2–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1989 Hilton Head second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1989* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 6-2 | Hu Na | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1986* | Taipei | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hu Na | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |