H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ingrid Bentzer vs Mary Carillo H2H: 0-1
Mary Carillo holds a 1–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Carillo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Carillo won the 1977 Rome third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 69
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mary Carillo | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mary Carillo | — | — | — | 1,775 | 47 | 45 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ingrid Bentzer | Mary Carillo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |