H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ingrid Bentzer vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-3
Nancy Richey holds a 3–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nancy Richey leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1968 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 82
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1968* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-1 6-2 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1968* | New York | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nancy Richey | 6-1 6-3 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1968* | Barranquilla | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-2 6-3 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ingrid Bentzer | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |
| 38 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |