H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Ingrid Bentzer vs Wendy Overton H2H: 1-1

Ingrid Bentzer and Wendy Overton are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on carpet, while Ingrid Bentzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1977 Seattle round of 32 6-3 2-6 6-2.

SWE Age 82 Right-Handed
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy Overton 6-3 2-6 6-2 Ingrid Bentzer Match data Feb 3, 1977* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet
Ingrid Bentzer 6-3 5-7 4-2 (ret.) Wendy Overton Match data Sep 19, 1974* R32 Orlando WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ingrid Bentzer 1,821 72 100 41.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Wendy Overton 1,913 123 142 46.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ingrid Bentzer Wendy Overton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 2–1 66.7% 1,520 0 0
22 1969 7–4 63.6% 1,604 0 0
23 1970 6–11 35.3% 1,584 0 0
24 1968 9–15 37.5% 1,448 0 0 1971 9–9 50.0% 1,680 0 0
25 1969 1–1 50.0% 1,475 0 0 1972 40–30 57.1% 1,884 0 0
26 1970 3–9 25.0% 1,504 0 0 1973 14–23 37.8% 1,753 0 0
27 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,618 0 0 1974 12–18 40.0% 1,769 0 0
28 1972 14–8 63.6% 1,716 0 2 1975 17–14 54.8% 1,853 0 0
29 1973 16–9 64.0% 1,771 0 6 1976 10–17 37.0% 1,756 0 0
30 1974 3–7 30.0% 1,699 0 7 1977 5–11 31.2% 1,716 0 0
31 1975 7–14 33.3% 1,648 0 7 1978 1–4 20.0% 1,652 0 0
32 1976 8–11 42.1% 1,637 0 7
33 1977 2–14 12.5% 1,553 0 7
34 1978 0–2 0.0% 1,542 0 7
38 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 7
39 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,523 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ingrid Bentzer Wendy Overton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 1970 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1968 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1971 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 6 5 11 54.5% 11 10 21 52.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 10 23 56.5%
26 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3%
27 1971 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 7 5 12 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1973 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 0 5 100.0% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
30 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 1975 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
34 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
38 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
39 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 3 9 12 25.0% 42 44 86 48.8% 9 24 33 27.3% 18 20 38 47.4% 30 28 58 51.7% 37 43 80 46.2% 22 22 44 50.0% 34 49 83 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ingrid Bentzer Wendy Overton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1520 100.5 +35 57.1% +0.28 1–0 +0.26
22 1969 1604 121.0 -45 +42 53.8% +0.42 4–0 (100%) +0.01
23 1970 1585 124.1 -72 +70 34.3% -0.69 1–2 (33%) -1.02
24 1968 1448 95.9 +24 +3 +37 33.3% -1.20 2–1 (67%) -0.33 1971 1680 141.5 -10 -102 -27 50.0% +0.38 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 99.6 -0.38
25 1969 1476 108.6 50.0% 0.00 1–1 -0.28 1972 1885 149.2 -37 -158 -105 56.0% +0.37 8–6 (57%) 7–5 (58%) 106.3 -9.20
26 1970 1504 109.6 +19 -44 24.0% -1.64 1–2 (33%) -0.64 1973 1754 141.1 +10 -31 -10 41.0% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 98.8 -5.52
27 1971 1619 131.2 -80 +26 51.3% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.20 1974 1770 145.0 +11 -70 42.4% -0.03 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -4.75
28 1972 1716 128.8 -96 +41 -263 57.1% +0.49 5–0 (100%) 0–2 +1.73 1975 1853 144.7 +22 -113 53.5% +0.27 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 97.8 -1.20
29 1973 1771 136.8 -27 -35 -201 57.6% +0.58 7–2 (78%) 2–2 (50%) 106.9 +1.76 1976 1757 127.1 -15 -29 40.0% -0.58 2–4 (33%) 1–1 -2.30
30 1974 1700 103.0 -11 +21 26.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 +0.16 1977 1716 121.9 -23 -28 32.4% -1.05 3–2 (60%) 0–1 -1.17
31 1975 1648 120.5 +36 +40 -90 35.4% -1.10 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.3 -0.36 1978 1653 101.8 +3 33.3% -0.75 0–2 +0.74
32 1976 1638 118.8 +46 -79 41.9% -0.72 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 +0.46
33 1977 1554 115.7 +41 +84 25.0% -1.94 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 93.4 -0.05
34 1978 1542 99.7 0.0% -4.00 0.00
38 1982 1530 98.6 0.0% -4.50 +0.02
39 1983 1524 100.3 0.0% -3.50 -0.17
Career 1822 126.3 -5 +23 -117 41.3% -0.66 26–21 (55%) 7–13 (35%) 99.4 +1.51 1914 146.3 -6 -86 -20 46.7% -0.10 36–32 (53%) 14–22 (39%) 100.3 -9.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.