H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Irina Spirlea vs Fang Li H2H: 2-0
Irina Spirlea holds a 2–0 lead over Fang Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Irina Spirlea leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina Spirlea won the 1998 Manhattan Beach third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1998* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 6-0 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 7-5 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | #165 | #7 | 2,577 | 2,021 | 211 | 149 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Irina Spirlea | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #61 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |