H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Irina Spirlea vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Irina Spirlea holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Spirlea leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Irina Spirlea won the 1996 Chicago third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1996* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Irina Spirlea | 6-3 6-0 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | #165 | #7 | 2,577 | 2,021 | 211 | 149 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Irina Spirlea | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #61 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |