H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Irina Spirlea vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 1-2
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–1 lead over Irina Spirlea in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 2–0 on grass, while Irina Spirlea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1998 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-4 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1998* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 6-4 5-7 7-5 | Irina Spirlea | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Yayuk Basuki | 7-6 6-1 | Irina Spirlea | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1995* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Irina Spirlea | 3-6 6-4 (ret.) | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irina Spirlea | #165 | #7 | 2,577 | 2,021 | 211 | 149 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Irina Spirlea | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #61 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #43 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1999 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |