H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Iris Riedel Kuhn vs Elena Granaturovna H2H: 0-1

Elena Granaturovna holds a 1–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Granaturovna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Granaturovna won the 1975 Cairo final 6-4 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Iris Riedel Kuhn
FRG Age 72
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Elena Granaturovna
URS

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Granaturovna 6-4 1-6 6-3 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Mar 9, 1975* F Cairo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iris Riedel Kuhn — — — 1,845 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Elena Granaturovna — — — 1,673 28 26 51.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Iris Riedel Kuhn Elena Granaturovna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0 1970 1–0 100.0% — 1,519 0 0
1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1971 8–3 72.7% — 1,604 0 1
1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,490 0 0 1972 1–4 20.0% — 1,562 0 1
1975 16–13 55.2% — 1,684 0 0 1973 3–3 50.0% — 1,561 0 1
1976 10–15 40.0% — 1,679 0 0 1974 3–7 30.0% — 1,564 0 1
1977 13–14 48.1% — 1,706 0 0 1975 8–7 53.3% — 1,622 0 2
1978 13–10 56.5% — 1,694 0 1 1976 3–0 100.0% — 1,660 0 3
1979 5–9 35.7% — 1,685 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,655 0 3
1980 28–9 75.7% — 1,820 0 4 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,654 0 3
1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,730 0 7 — — — — — — —
1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,627 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Iris Riedel Kuhn Elena Granaturovna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 0 1 100.0%
1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
1975 — — — — 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1973 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1978 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1976 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% — — — — — — — —
1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1980 — — — — 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
1981 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1 5 6 16.7% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 15 23 34.8% Career — — — — 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 14 9 23 60.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Iris Riedel Kuhn Elena Granaturovna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.37 1970 1520 102.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 — — +0.18
1973 1479 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12 1971 1604 111.1 — — — — +87 -52 — 64.0% +0.76 3–0 (100%) — — +2.37
1974 1491 113.8 — — — — — +14 — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — +0.12 1972 1562 98.4 — — — — +71 — — 35.7% -1.64 1–3 (25%) — — +1.15
1975 1685 137.0 — — — — -42 +13 — 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.17 1973 1562 103.9 — — — — +84 — — 41.7% -0.50 1–1 — — +1.51
1976 1680 125.4 — — — — -69 +22 — 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — -0.74 1974 1564 124.4 — — — — +122 — — 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) — — -0.06
1977 1706 135.3 — — — — -154 +71 — 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.31 1975 1622 131.2 — — — — — -6 — 56.8% +0.57 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.95
1978 1694 124.7 — — — — -99 -10 -173 58.5% +0.91 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +2.71 1976 1660 108.5 — — — — — +14 — 85.7% +2.29 1–0 — — +0.74
1979 1685 123.5 — — — — — +33 — 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -1.31 1978 1655 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.17
1980 1820 140.6 — — — — — +136 — 72.7% +1.95 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 +1.28 1979 1654 113.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +2.20 0–1 — — +0.26
1981 1730 122.0 — — — — — +227 — 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1627 97.1 — — — — — +128 — 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1845 136.1 — — — — -86 +85 -173 52.5% +0.14 28–32 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 99.6 +0.53 Career 1673 125.7 — — — — +92 -17 — 53.1% +0.20 10–14 (42%) 1–2 (33%) 97.8 +12.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.