H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Iris Riedel Kuhn vs Janice Metcalf H2H: 0-1

Janice Metcalf holds a 1–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janice Metcalf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janice Metcalf won the 1975 Barcelona final 4-6 6-1 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janice Metcalf 4-6 6-1 6-4 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Oct 19, 1975* F Barcelona WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iris Riedel Kuhn 1,845 104 96 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Janice Metcalf 1,817 57 39 59.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Iris Riedel Kuhn Janice Metcalf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1970 6–4 60.0% 1,551 0 0
18 1972 1–2 33.3% 1,484 0 0 1971 2–5 28.6% 1,528 0 0
19 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,479 0 0 1972 23–7 76.7% 1,727 0 3
20 1974 2–4 33.3% 1,490 0 0 1973 8–4 66.7% 1,771 0 3
21 1975 16–13 55.2% 1,684 0 0
22 1976 10–15 40.0% 1,679 0 0 1975 9–4 69.2% 1,812 0 5
23 1977 13–14 48.1% 1,706 0 0 1976 9–15 37.5% 1,706 0 5
24 1978 13–10 56.5% 1,694 0 1
25 1979 5–9 35.7% 1,685 0 1
26 1980 28–9 75.7% 1,820 0 4
27 1981 15–13 53.6% 1,730 0 7
28 1982 1–6 14.3% 1,627 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Iris Riedel Kuhn Janice Metcalf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1971 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 8 1 9 88.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 0 1 100.0%
20 1974 2 4 6 33.3% 1973 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1975 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1975 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1978 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1980 25 7 32 78.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1981 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1982 1 6 7 14.3%
Career 1 5 6 16.7% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 8 15 23 34.8% 17 7 24 70.8% 24 17 41 58.5% 13 11 24 54.2% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Iris Riedel Kuhn Janice Metcalf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1970 1552 106.4 +3 +40 57.1% +0.81 1–0 1–1 +1.33
18 1972 1485 97.6 33.3% -1.33 1–0 +0.37 1971 1529 112.7 0 33.3% -0.80 0–1 +0.18
19 1973 1479 104.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.12 1972 1728 136.6 +19 -59 -68 70.6% +1.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 106.7 +4.65
20 1974 1491 113.8 +14 45.5% -0.64 0–1 +0.12 1973 1772 130.2 +30 -97 62.1% +1.31 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.3 +1.50
21 1975 1685 137.0 -42 +13 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.17
22 1976 1680 125.4 -69 +22 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 -0.74 1975 1813 123.0 +51 -91 60.6% +1.06 5–2 (71%) 0–2 +2.00
23 1977 1706 135.3 -154 +71 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.31 1976 1706 119.5 +77 -41 -24 41.4% -0.64 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 95.0 -1.18
24 1978 1694 124.7 -99 -10 -173 58.5% +0.91 2–5 (29%) 1–1 +2.71
25 1979 1685 123.5 +33 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 -1.31
26 1980 1820 140.6 +136 72.7% +1.95 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 +1.28
27 1981 1730 122.0 +227 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.12
28 1982 1627 97.1 +128 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 +0.33
Career 1845 136.1 -86 +85 -173 52.5% +0.14 28–32 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 99.6 +0.53 1817 131.5 +33 -55 -32 56.7% +0.67 19–13 (59%) 6–10 (38%) 101.9 +8.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.