H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Isabel Cueto vs Laura Garrone H2H: 5-3

Isabel Cueto holds a 5–3 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 4–3 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1990 Paris round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Isabel Cueto
GER Age 57 Right-Handed
H2H
5 – 3
8 main-draw meetings
Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Garrone #67 4-6 6-2 6-3 Isabel Cueto #26 Match data Sep 20, 1990* R32 Paris Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto #31 6-1 6-3 Laura Garrone #86 Match data Apr 5, 1990* R32 Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Isabel Cueto #24 6-1 6-1 Laura Garrone #73 Match data Sep 1, 1988* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Isabel Cueto #30 6-1 6-4 Laura Garrone #62 Match data May 11, 1988* R64 Berlin Open Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Isabel Cueto #32 6-3 6-3 Laura Garrone #87 Match data Dec 5, 1987* QF Buenos Aires WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto #92 6-1 3-6 6-2 Laura Garrone #36 Match data Apr 2, 1987* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Laura Garrone #48 6-2 6-4 Isabel Cueto #108 Match data Sep 20, 1986* QF Athens WTA 250 Clay
Laura Garrone 6-3 4-6 6-2 Isabel Cueto Match data May 4, 1985* QF Taranto WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Isabel Cueto Laura Garrone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0
17 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0
18 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0
19 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0
20 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0
21 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0
22 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0
23 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Isabel Cueto Laura Garrone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% — — — — — — — — 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Isabel Cueto Laura Garrone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1984 1509 106.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1985 1521 110.4 — — — — +17 +59 — 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
17 1986 1539 121.5 — — — — -48 +97 — 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29
18 1987 1761 135.7 — — — — -187 +64 — 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90
19 1988 1826 141.4 — — — — -254 +103 — 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27
20 1989 1817 132.8 — — — — — +87 — 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56
21 1990 1799 139.4 — — — — -220 +80 — 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18
22 1991 1662 120.0 — — — — -82 +47 — 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1992 1591 97.8 — — — — -65 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.24 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1885 137.0 — — — — -131 +81 — 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33 — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.