H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Isabel Cueto vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-1

Isabel Cueto and Neige Dias are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1988 Hamburg Open round of 16 6-4 6-3.

GER Age 57 Right-Handed
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #26 6-4 6-3 Neige Dias Match data Jul 29, 1988* R16 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay
Neige Dias 6-2 6-2 Isabel Cueto #100 Match data Apr 25, 1986* R16 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Neige Dias 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Isabel Cueto Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,493 0 0
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
16 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
18 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0 1985 6–12 33.3% 1,527 0 0
19 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2 1986 19–19 50.0% 1,610 0 0
20 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4 1987 12–15 44.4% 1,647 0 1
21 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5 1988 25–13 65.8% 1,712 0 2
22 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5 1989 9–10 47.4% 1,673 0 2
23 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Isabel Cueto Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
16 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0%
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
23 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Isabel Cueto Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 -0.12
15 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12 1982 1497 97.5 +31 50.0% -0.63 +0.58
16 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15 1984 1482 98.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.16
18 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28 1985 1528 114.5 +21 +57 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40 1986 1611 116.1 +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58 1987 1648 123.5 -61 +20 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94 1988 1712 129.5 -100 +84 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03 1989 1674 112.9 +55 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
23 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24
Career 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33 1749 122.0 -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.