H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Isabel Cueto vs Sabine Hack H2H: 2-1
Isabel Cueto holds a 2–1 lead over Sabine Hack in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay, while Sabine Hack leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1992 Wellington third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1992* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sabine Hack | 6-3 6-2 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1989* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
| Dec 3, 1987* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 7-6 7-5 | Sabine Hack | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabel Cueto | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |