H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Isabel Cueto vs Silke Frankl H2H: 1-0

Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Frankl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Amelia Island round of 64 6-2 6-1.

GER Age 57 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #32 6-2 6-1 Silke Frankl #119 Match data Apr 12, 1989* R64 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Silke Frankl #940 #67 40 1,649 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Isabel Cueto Silke Frankl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0 1988 7–9 43.8% #122 1,525 0 0
19 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2 1989 0–6 0.0% #186 1,457 0 0
20 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4 1990 3–5 37.5% #160 1,478 0 0
21 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5 1991 7–11 38.9% #119 1,505 0 0
22 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5 1992 9–14 39.1% #117 1,557 0 0
23 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5 1993 7–11 38.9% #93 1,584 0 0
24 1994 9–12 42.9% #78 1,583 0 0
25 1995 0–9 0.0% #421 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Isabel Cueto Silke Frankl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
20 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1995 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 14 18 22.2% 34 49 83 41.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 8 8 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Isabel Cueto Silke Frankl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12
16 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28 1988 1525 107.1 -4 +53 40.0% -0.69 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) +1.10
19 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40 1989 1457 96.0 +40 14.3% -2.71 0–2 1–1 +0.23
20 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58 1990 1479 108.6 +37 +16 47.4% -0.37 0–3 (0%) 1–0 +0.07
21 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94 1991 1506 111.4 -53 +73 39.0% -0.88 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +0.45
22 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03 1992 1557 108.4 -107 +55 34.7% -1.22 4–1 (80%) 1–1 -0.02
23 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24 1993 1585 119.7 +43 41.5% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 0–1 +0.27
24 1994 1584 111.9 -177 +77 +41 41.3% -1.04 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 +1.26
25 1995 1491 92.1 +74 +59 0.0% -4.33 -0.36
Career 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33 1650 111.9 -73 +58 +50 35.7% -1.20 15–14 (52%) 7–9 (44%) 102.0 +2.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.