H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-1
Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Berlin second round 6-7 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1989* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-7 7-6 6-3 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |