H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Laura Garrone H2H: 2-0
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 2–0 lead over Laura Garrone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1988 Nice quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1988* | Nice | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-2 6-3 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Isabelle Demongeot | 3-6 6-2 8-6 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |