H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 0-1
Mariaan De Swardt holds a 1–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mariaan De Swardt won the 1995 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mariaan De Swardt | 6-4 6-3 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |