H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-0
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 2–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1991 Leipzig third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1991* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Isabelle Demongeot | 7-6 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-3 7-5 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |