H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Patricia Tarabini H2H: 3-1
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 3–1 lead over Patricia Tarabini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Isabelle Demongeot leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Tarabini won the 1990 Rome second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1990* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Patricia Tarabini | 6-1 6-4 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
| May 19, 1988* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 7-6 6-4 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 7-5 6-0 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| May 27, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-2 7-5 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Tarabini | #617 | #29 | 29 | 1,743 | 104 | 122 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Patricia Tarabini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #36 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #60 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #126 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #104 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |