H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Isabelle Demongeot vs Radka Bobkova H2H: 0-1
Radka Bobkova holds a 1–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Radka Bobkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Radka Bobkova won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Radka Bobkova | 6-2 7-5 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Radka Bobkova | #639 | #47 | 322 | 1,658 | 47 | 73 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Isabelle Demongeot | Radka Bobkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #53 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #85 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #130 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,525 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #88 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |