H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 3-0
Iva Budarova holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1985 Filderstadt fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1985* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Budarova | 6-3 6-4 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| May 13, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 2-6 6-2 7-5 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Iva Budarova | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |