H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 0-2
Barbara Paulus holds a 2–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Paulus leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1989 Estoril third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1989* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 6-2 6-0 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| May 21, 1988* | Geneva | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 6-2 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |