H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-0
Iva Budarova holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1987 Berlin third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1987* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-2 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Dec 6, 1979* | Helsingfors | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Iva Budarova | 6-4 6-1 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Iva Budarova | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |