H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-2
Isabel Cueto holds a 2–1 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay, while Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Bastad fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1989* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-1 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1988* | Athens | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-0 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1984* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 6-2 6-0 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |